Today’s Top Stories
- US road bridge falls into river (BBC News - Home)
- Woolwich attack 'hard to prevent' (BBC News - Home)
- Asia on Debt Binge as World Sobers Up (WSJ.com: World News)
- Photos of the Day: May 23 (WSJ.com: World News)
- DealBook: Obama Nominates 2 Senate Aides for S.E.C. Posts (NYT > Business Day)
- Japan bonds stability ‘extremely desirable’:Kuroda (MarketWatch.com - Top Stories)
- DealBook: Banks’ Lobbyists Help in Drafting Financial Bills (NYT > Business Day)
- Obama picks Stein and Piwowar for SEC (Business News, Financial News, Business Headlines & Analysis - The Washington Post)
- Japan’s Abe reiterates commitment to reforms (MarketWatch.com - Top Stories)
- How powerful is Bitcoin? (Business and financial news - CNNMoney.com)
- Google faces new FTC probe over display ads (Business News, Financial News, Business Headlines & Analysis - The Washington Post)
Other Blog Headlines
- Friday: Durable Goods (and a comment on housing driving the recovery) (Calculated Risk)
- Wealth On A Plane (The Big Picture)
- Fed Watch: Bernanke Saves the Day (Economist's View)
- Twitter Digest: 2013-05-22 (Paul Kedrosky's Infectious Greed)
Category Archives: Bankruptcies
Last week I appeared on Xinhua’s CNC World Report discussing the Kodak bankruptcy.
The discussion centered on Kodak’s history and its response to industry change. As I mentioned in the interview, Kodak was unable to change its internal culture so as to benefit from the shift to digital photography – technological change that, paradoxically, it helped usher in. Kodak did not realize the potential of digital photography early enough and it reacted late, by which time it was far too late to play catch up.
A little snippet:
You can watch the full clip below (or by clicking on this link):
More on this topic (What's this?)
Link Post (weekly) (Venture Chronicles, 1/23/12)
Kodak (EKDKQ) Sells Part of Business to Shutterfly (ValueWalk.com, 3/2/12)
Shutterfly Taking Advantage of Kodak's Restructuring (Benzinga, 3/2/12)
In January I predicted that “major” bankruptcies in 2010 would number around 300 (see Notable Bankruptcies of 2010: Q1). According to Bankruptcydata.com, there were 59 “major” filings in the first half of 2010. Assuming that bankruptcies are equally distributed throughout the year, this puts us on pace for around 120 bankruptcies. Again, this would be well shy of my prediction.
In previous posts I discussed why I believed “major” business bankruptcies were tracking below expectations (see Notable Bankruptcies of 2010: Q1 and Notable Bankruptcies of 2009). The candidate explanations include: an improving economy; massive government stimulus/liquidity programs keeping structurally weaker firms on artificial life support; and the recovery disconnect between Main St. and Wall St. (i.e., small-firm bankruptcies are on the rise even while major bankruptcies have declined).
Personally, I continue to believe that the significant dip in “major” business bankruptcies that we have witnessed over the past year has a lot to do with the extraordinary government stimulus and liquidity programs. Nowhere has this been more evident than in the disconnect between the bankruptcy patterns across small and large corporations (see Notable Bankruptcies of 2010: Q1 for details). And as I’ve maintained all along, absent a second round of stimulus, we will find out if my hypothesis is correct as the stimulus and liquidity programs begin to wind down. In this sense then, the true test for corporate balance sheets (and by extension, the economy) will come in the second half of the year.
Given the recent troubles in Europe and the softer economic employment and growth numbers at home, it continues to be my expectation that the pace of corporate bankruptcy filings will increase in the second half of 2010. Will we ultimately reach 300 “major” business bankruptcies? At this point, likely not. But I do not think 200 is out of the question.
If fundamentally weak companies are being propped up by an artificially-stimulated economy that cannot structurally support them, it is only a matter of time before bankruptcies begin to reflect true underlying economic fundamentals.
Anyhow, below you can find an updated list of what I see as the “noteworthy” bankruptcies of 2010, as reported by Bankrupctydata.com. New additions since March appear in RED (please note that this is not an exhaustive list):
More on this topic (What's this?)
Q1 2010 Hedge Fund 13F-HR Spreadsheets (The Enlightened American, 5/22/10)
Mobile Minute at the 2010 StartUp Challenge with Sean Black from Sales Crunch (Wall St. Cheat Sheet, 5/27/10)
Monthly Blog Update – April 2010 (Dividend Stocks, 5/10/10)
In January I predicted that “major” bankruptcies in 2010 would number around 300 (see Notable Bankruptcies of 2009). According to Bankruptcydata.com, there were 29 “major” filings in the first quarter of 2010. Assuming that bankruptcies are equally distributed throughout the year, this puts us on pace for around 120 bankruptcies. That would be well shy of my prediction.
What a difference a year makes!
As I mentioned in previous posts (see Notable Bankruptcies of 2009: Q3 and Notable Bankruptcies of 2009), the stylized fact that the pace of corporate bankruptcies diminished throughout 2009, and now into 2010, begs the question of whether the underlying cause was a structurally improved economy or the massive Fed/Treasury liquidity programs keeping weaker firms on artificial life support.
Although the economy certainly seems to be improving (the recent uptick in employment stands as evidence of such an improvement), I still believe that the drop in bankruptcies has a lot to do with the Fed/Treasury liquidity programs. We will find out shortly as the Fed/Treasury now begin to unwind such programs, and with peak stimulus now behind us. In this sense then, I believe that the true test for corporate balance sheets (and by extension, the economy) will come in the second half of the year.
It is therefore still my expectation that the pace of corporate bankruptcy filings will increase throughout 2010. If fundamentally weak companies are being propped up by the provision of credit/liquidity to an economy that cannot structurally support them, it is only a matter of time before bankruptcies begin to reflect the true underlying economic fundamentals.
Anyhow, below you can find an updated list of what I see as the “noteworthy” bankruptcies of 2010, as reported by Bankrupctydata.com (please note that this is not an exhaustive list):
In addition to the “notable” bankruptcies (e.g., those firms with assets greater than $50M) tracked by Bankruptcydata, the U.S. government tracks all bankruptcy filings by type (e.g., Chapter 7, Chapter 11, Chapter 13). You can find detailed bankruptcy statistics at the U.S. Courts website or from ABI. Business bankruptcies for all of 2009 came in at 60,837 compared to 43,546 for 2008.
The chart above presents annual (calendar year) business bankruptcy filings from 1990-2009 (click on the picture for a larger image). The number of filings had been trending steadily downward from 1990 through 2006. In 2007 the numbers began to reverse course. My expectation for 2009 was for 55,000 total business bankruptcies (see Notable Bankruptcies of 2009: Q1).
Taking stock of my 2009 predictions: They were a bit on the high side in the “notable” bankruptcy category, but a bit on the low side for total business bankruptcies. So I underestimated the number of small-firm bankruptcies and over-estimated the number of large-firm bankruptcies.
What can we make about the difference in accuracy across my predictions given that they were estimated using the same predictive methodology?
I think it speaks to the nature of the Fed/Treasury liquidity provisions and its impact on the broader economy. That is, the reason we did not observe large-firm bankruptcies more in line with my prediction is probably because larger firms had greater access to liquidity and were beneficiaries of the stimulus program. By contrast, smaller businesses struggled to access capital markets thereby exacerbating their crisis. Putting numbers to it: There was an 8% increase in large-firm bankruptcies from 2008 to 2009, but a 40% increase in small-firm bankruptcies.
This is why I believe that the dip in the pace of large-firm bankruptcies throughout 2009 was more a function of liquidity provisions than a wildly improving economy. The difficulty small firms had obtaining capital was a recurring theme in 2009. And for good reason. Unfortunately, I don’t expect that to change anytime soon.
More on this topic (What's this?)
A Review of Legal Immigrants Into The U.S. From 1820 To 2010 (Top Foreign Stocks, 3/12/13)
Today's leading Industry (Samurai Trader, 1/9/13)
Fundamental vs Cap-Weight Portfolio: Still Very Close after 2 and a Half Years (Canadian Financial DIY, 2/6/13)